|
| Susan Patricia Nepge | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 18:59:20 UTC
I often enjoy that area of the Seapoint Promenade and like to see others enjoying it too. We all so need unimpeded access to nature. |
| |
| JANET MANCA | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 18:49:12 UTC
Any visit to the pavilion will show that it is not used predominantly by Sea Point residents, but by many from all walks of life in our city. |
| |
| Catherine Dickerson | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 18:18:57 UTC
|
| |
| Sandra Gie | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 18:18:33 UTC
There is no valid reason to loose a priceless asset for yet another hotel. We have more than enough in cape Town. |
| |
| Claire Jorgensen | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 18:17:48 UTC
The Pavilion space is what makes Cape Town the city that it is. I would be highly disappointed if it is lost to developers. |
| |
| Barry Gie | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 18:16:00 UTC
We can't allow greedy developers to destroy the ebautiful seafront both for the current inhabitants of Cape Town nor for future generations. |
| |
| Dmitry Makogon | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 18:00:47 UTC
|
| |
| Mark Murray | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 17:13:17 UTC
|
| |
| Taryn Murray | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 17:12:04 UTC
|
| |
| Robyn Poole | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 16:10:50 UTC
|
| |
| heather townsend | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 15:15:37 UTC
|
| |
| Laurian Botha | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 14:59:53 UTC
|
| |
| cas van aardenne | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 14:57:46 UTC
I swim at the pool three times a week and it is a great location to unwind after a hard working day. How on earth can some-one thing of changing this space.
After been living in the uk for 11 years and seeing how things work over there we should be increasing public space not removing it or changing it.
This petition shows what the people want and indeed what all of SA should be doing.. protecting and preserving our public space!! |
| |
| Ishara & Vimesh Madh | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 14:07:57 UTC
To the developers who want our Sea front: Stop being greedy and selfish! This promenade is for everyone, not the select few that can afford to throw mooney away at expensive cafes and shops. Leave the natural beauty of one of the last public seafronts in SA open to the public! |
| |
| robert Nicholls | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 14:04:28 UTC
I love running on the Sea Point promenade and would hate to see the entire area which is so vibrant and allows an entire cross section of different local people, enjoying the beauty of the area be destroyed by money hungry developers who have no idea of community |
| |
| James | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 13:43:03 UTC
|
| |
| Bradley du Toit | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 13:22:24 UTC
This is free for all. One of our last natural beauty's that isn't owned by anyone but enjoyed by everyone. Let your soul own the moments. This is either a political plan to bring in the right people to upset the normal wonderful balance we have in the Cape, or to fill the pockets of certain people. |
| |
| Maria Strydom | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 13:16:33 UTC
|
| |
| Jeremy de Tolly | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 12:50:59 UTC
There's more than enough underutilised retail and residential floorspace in the sea point suburb itself. The promenade area offers world class beauty to ANYONE who chooses to enjoy it. Leave it alone please. |
| |
| Marilyn Wilensky | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 12:47:54 UTC
|
| |
| David Pugh | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 12:45:25 UTC
|
| |
| Jeff Levy | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 12:34:04 UTC
Cape Town City Council should take on the role as developer of the said invaluable property, and develope such in a way that can be enjoyed by the general public. |
| |
| eli baker | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 12:21:45 UTC
IF PERMISSION IS NOT WITHHELD IN THIS INSTANCE IT WILL LEAD TO THE CONFISCATION OF THE INTIRE BEACH FRONT FROM SEA POINT TO MOUILLE POINT AND EVERY BEACH FRONT THROUGHOUT S.A. AND THE EXCUSE AND REASON GIVEN WILL BE THAT OUR AUTHORITIES ARE HAVING PROBLEMS BALANCING THEIR BUDGETS. |
| |
| Joanne Levitan | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 12:14:08 UTC
|
| |
| Sara Dane | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:52:25 UTC
This unique and important public space must be preserved! |
| |
| Vanesa Green | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:48:29 UTC
Leave it be please |
| |
| Wendy Alport | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:47:11 UTC
Leave the promonade along |
| |
| Stef Gazzilli | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:45:01 UTC
No way |
| |
| cheryl de Carvalho | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:43:48 UTC
Keep it the way it is. |
| |
| Hannes Burger | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:34:35 UTC
|
| |
| Julian Emdon | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:24:05 UTC
The beachfront is not just for the rich and wealthy tourists, it is an oasis for all, free from consumerism and commercialism! |
| |
| Annemie van den Heev | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:19:40 UTC
|
| |
| Cate Morton | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:16:18 UTC
|
| |
| Rene Veldsman | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 10:17:49 UTC
|
| |
| Karen Cooper | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 10:16:24 UTC
|
| |
| Marianne Visser | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:31:10 UTC
|
| |
| John Rupert | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:24:53 UTC
Save Seapoint |
| |
| christiaan van asweg | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:23:47 UTC
|
| |
| Alexander Geh | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:20:24 UTC
|
| |
| OTTO THANING | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:18:36 UTC
I wholeheartedly support the need to prevent a commercial development of the Pavilion precinct. It must be a place of recreation FOR ALL.
However, that is not enough. It has to be properly maintained and renovated. Its present state of disrepair is the most relevant reason for some one to propose a commercial 'upgrade' for the area - and that means a complete loss of this gem to the people who need to be able to enjoy it. |
| |
| Harri Solomon | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:15:39 UTC
Greed has a way of sticking its ugly neck out from time to time. Stick it back tortoise! |
| |
| Nathan Kalam | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:57:41 UTC
|
| |
| Janine Venter | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:57:04 UTC
Leave our public spaces and areas of natural beauty alone! There are enough shopping centres and hotels! |
| |
| Rohan Young | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:52:32 UTC
|
| |
| Pete Smith | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:49:41 UTC
|
| |
| Paul | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:47:27 UTC
we need MORE public space - not less. there is almost nothing left... |
| |
| jay lieb | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:19:10 UTC
|
| |
| Megan Riley | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:01:24 UTC
Sea Point promenade must be for all to enjoy, not for the elite few. Cape Town's safe public spaces are disappearing. This must not happen here. |
| |
| MAtthew Garvey | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 06:20:35 UTC
|
| |
| RUBIDGE - Henk | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 05:43:06 UTC
The proposed development on the seaward side of Beach Road represents the start of the total loss of what is the treasured possession of Capetonians, thousands of whom use the open promenade daily for leisure activities, not to mention visitors and tourists. The site is comparable to the open seaside areas of great cities like Nice in France and Santa Barbara in California. It should be jealousy guarded as open land by every generation. This proposal is simply the thin edge of the wedge which will lead to commercialisation of the beach-front and the loss of a priceless amenity. Logistically, the development would result in mixing the speedway element of Beach Road as a thoroughfare from suburbs further south to the city and slow-moving traffic (and pedestrians) approaching and leaving the proposed commercial development - a recipe for serious accidents. The current position is not 'broke', so don't fix it! It would be a disaster. |
| |
