|
| Vanesa Green | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:48:29 UTC Leave it be please |
| |
| Wendy Alport | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:47:11 UTC Leave the promonade along |
| |
| Stef Gazzilli | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:45:01 UTC No way |
| |
| cheryl de Carvalho | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:43:48 UTC Keep it the way it is. |
| |
| Hannes Burger | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:34:35 UTC
|
| |
| Julian Emdon | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:24:05 UTC The beachfront is not just for the rich and wealthy tourists, it is an oasis for all, free from consumerism and commercialism! |
| |
| Annemie van den Heev | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:19:40 UTC
|
| |
| Cate Morton | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 11:16:18 UTC
|
| |
| Rene Veldsman | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 10:17:49 UTC
|
| |
| Karen Cooper | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 10:16:24 UTC
|
| |
| Marianne Visser | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:31:10 UTC
|
| |
| John Rupert | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:24:53 UTC Save Seapoint |
| |
| christiaan van asweg | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:23:47 UTC
|
| |
| Alexander Geh | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:20:24 UTC
|
| |
| OTTO THANING | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:18:36 UTC I wholeheartedly support the need to prevent a commercial development of the Pavilion precinct. It must be a place of recreation FOR ALL. However, that is not enough. It has to be properly maintained and renovated. Its present state of disrepair is the most relevant reason for some one to propose a commercial 'upgrade' for the area - and that means a complete loss of this gem to the people who need to be able to enjoy it. |
| |
| Harri Solomon | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 09:15:39 UTC Greed has a way of sticking its ugly neck out from time to time. Stick it back tortoise! |
| |
| Nathan Kalam | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:57:41 UTC
|
| |
| Janine Venter | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:57:04 UTC Leave our public spaces and areas of natural beauty alone! There are enough shopping centres and hotels! |
| |
| Rohan Young | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:52:32 UTC
|
| |
| Pete Smith | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:49:41 UTC
|
| |
| Paul | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:47:27 UTC we need MORE public space - not less. there is almost nothing left... |
| |
| jay lieb | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:19:10 UTC
|
| |
| Megan Riley | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 08:01:24 UTC Sea Point promenade must be for all to enjoy, not for the elite few. Cape Town's safe public spaces are disappearing. This must not happen here. |
| |
| MAtthew Garvey | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 06:20:35 UTC
|
| |
| RUBIDGE - Henk | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 05:43:06 UTC The proposed development on the seaward side of Beach Road represents the start of the total loss of what is the treasured possession of Capetonians, thousands of whom use the open promenade daily for leisure activities, not to mention visitors and tourists. The site is comparable to the open seaside areas of great cities like Nice in France and Santa Barbara in California. It should be jealousy guarded as open land by every generation. This proposal is simply the thin edge of the wedge which will lead to commercialisation of the beach-front and the loss of a priceless amenity. Logistically, the development would result in mixing the speedway element of Beach Road as a thoroughfare from suburbs further south to the city and slow-moving traffic (and pedestrians) approaching and leaving the proposed commercial development - a recipe for serious accidents. The current position is not 'broke', so don't fix it! It would be a disaster. |
| |
| Caroline Foot | Signed on: Fri 11 Apr 2008 04:41:38 UTC No parkland or green space in a built up city environment should ever be rezoned to make way for a building development. Any City Council that allows such land to be rezoned is incredibly shortsighted. |
| |
| Gil Marsden | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 19:19:58 UTC
|
| |
| Pam & Maurice Philli | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 19:09:12 UTC Under no circumstances should any development take place on the relevant properties, all of which are historically enjoyed over decades by the public at large. A unique beachfront which must be protected. |
| |
| George van Dam | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 18:00:05 UTC
|
| |
| Renée Scalabrino | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 17:32:53 UTC
|
| |
| Brenda Gillam | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 17:00:14 UTC Stunning place don't destroy it. We vists every 6 months and love the views |
| |
| James Gillam | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:59:07 UTC Most amazing view why spoil it |
| |
| Lana Joffe | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:58:14 UTC
|
| |
| Dawie Bosch | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:52:14 UTC
|
| |
| Anna Mackenzie | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:51:38 UTC Not everything needs to be developed!Where else is there a public swimming pool in CT?No No |
| |
| Lee Staff | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:31:14 UTC
|
| |
| Pippa Moll | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:25:19 UTC
|
| |
| Bronwyn Lai Lan | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 15:44:45 UTC
|
| |
| Jessica Hadley Grave | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 15:35:45 UTC For the runners, walkers, dog walkers, soccer players, beach bathers, swimmers and surfers... |
| |
| Emma Levy | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 15:13:19 UTC Why destroy the only truly multi-racial place in Sea Point? Our public resources may be limited, but when we have as fantastic a facility as the Pavillion we should cherish it. |
| |
| Linda van de Vijver | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 15:11:49 UTC
|
| |
| martin rollo | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 14:59:59 UTC
|
| |
| Najmunesa Moose | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 14:46:05 UTC
|
| |
| Carmen | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 14:41:11 UTC
|
| |
| Ute Kuhlmann | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 14:32:36 UTC The Seapoint promenade and pool are for all and should stay Public Space! |
| |
| Marina Griebenow | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 14:01:59 UTC Since I arrived in Cape Town in 1985 the Sea Point Pavilion has always been a place where one can go and relax and enjoy the sea in relative safety. Its charms (and vices) have even been captured in song by Amanda Strydom called "Straatbank Esplanade" (lyrics by Afrikaans poet and academic Hennie Aucamp), so why tamper with it? Surely the Waterfront development should be enough to satisfy the money-hungry developers who in most cases have no sense of aesthetics! |
| |
| Freda Bennett | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 13:42:28 UTC If allowed to proceed this development will be the beginning of the end of public space along the beachfront. It must remain as is - it is well used by walkers/strollers to watch the activities in the pool area and is ideal for use as quiet recreational space. |
| |
| Kate Greaves | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 13:33:53 UTC
|
| |
| Rene Sellar | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 13:13:49 UTC Let's not turn the promonade into a concrete jungle, and in so doing, take away from the locals a much loved place for some quality r&r. Please! |
| |
| Michelle Sellar | Signed on: Thu 10 Apr 2008 13:08:28 UTC We have enough hotels and unsightly match box estates taking away our open spaces in Cape Town. Please leave the Promonade untouched! |
| |