|
| paul silberman | Signed on: Tue 10 Mar 2009 20:42:20 UTC preserve the public open space.The development of the area concerned will not stop there .Eventually there will be no beaches or open spaces left. |
| |
| P.GROLL | Signed on: Tue 10 Mar 2009 17:50:32 UTC
|
| |
| claire price | Signed on: Tue 10 Mar 2009 08:25:30 UTC
|
| |
| Mitchell Besser | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 20:14:02 UTC No Development |
| |
| Michael Allen | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 18:45:08 UTC Save the seafront |
| |
| jackie Fourie | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 17:56:28 UTC
|
| |
| Martine Jackson | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 17:23:30 UTC
|
| |
| Greg Klotz | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 17:22:18 UTC
|
| |
| Janine Lidsky | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 16:16:52 UTC
|
| |
| Laurence Sachs | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 13:04:46 UTC
|
| |
| Sue Marx | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 12:55:10 UTC
|
| |
| Julia Kane | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 12:34:52 UTC The promenade has remained as such for decades. All Capetonians and visitors enjoy these open recreational spaces next to the seafront. At the moment there are marathons and Argus cycle races that are broadcast overseas and show potential tourists our beautiful coast line...besides have they thought of the traffic problem with these development ideas? |
| |
| David Dunton | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 12:25:13 UTC Don\'t do it! |
| |
| Heinrich Wolff | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 11:36:11 UTC
|
| |
| Laila Retief | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 11:09:47 UTC
|
| |
| Rick de Satge | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 09:04:04 UTC Protect public open space and unrestricted access to the beachfront |
| |
| James Retief | Signed on: Mon 09 Mar 2009 08:40:02 UTC Against development |
| |
| Jill Pye | Signed on: Sun 08 Mar 2009 21:26:33 UTC
|
| |
| Steven Isacowitz | Signed on: Sun 08 Mar 2009 17:49:55 UTC
|
| |
| Elizaberh Doyle | Signed on: Sun 08 Mar 2009 15:26:48 UTC
|
| |
| Patricia Fine | Signed on: Sun 08 Mar 2009 14:17:35 UTC We need to take seriously the protection of our unique coastline and shore. It is everone\'s inalienable right to have access to the seafront and no one should have to pay for it. Development on this site is insensitive, ecologiclly unsound and commercial greed. |
| |
| Christa Vermeulen | Signed on: Sat 07 Mar 2009 21:41:32 UTC enjoy Sea Point always - like to walk on the promenade and would not like to see it changed into a concrete jungle |
| |
| Glenda Kruss van der | Signed on: Sat 07 Mar 2009 14:49:00 UTC The sea front is our common heritage. |
| |
| Ashley Davis | Signed on: Sat 07 Mar 2009 08:29:27 UTC It\'s a place where a lot of locals go to relax, exercise, walk and socialize, its one of the best spots in town. Why change it for money. |
| |
| Susan Dawson | Signed on: Sat 07 Mar 2009 02:54:22 UTC Why is it that the smell of money and the greed of developers always combine to kill the magic and beauty of a special place? Open spaces of green, and trees and flowers are the very bestest healing muti to the soul; especially in places that are already pretty much built up. To maintain the sanity of people, it is important to leave Sea Point just as it is. The pool complex is one of the best in the world and should be jealously guarded and maintained. Its magnificent setting and surroundings are unsurpassed in their present state. Where else in the world does one find such an equal? The beauty of Torremelinos on the Costa del Sol was murdered and destroyed when it was finally discovered and the developers moved in. The magic of the place evaporated forever by the continuous building of high-rise complexes making it yet another overcrowded, ugly blot on the Mediterranean coastal landscape. Do intelligent planners ( I presume they are intelligent?) really wish to sell their souls and condemn the beautiful green sanctuary that has survived along the Sea Point promenade for so long; and for what? It is unethical and dishonest to destroy natural beauty for financial gain, especially when the majority of South Africans are agin\' the move. Keep South Africa beautiful. Once the beauty has disappeared, the ugliness will remain. Who, in their heart of hearts would be proud to be responsible for that? It would be a permanent fixture, a disfiguring scar, a monument to ugliness to haunt them for the rest of their days! That is if they are man enough to have a conscience and to be responsible for their own actions _ and if not, then they should not be holding such a position of power. Long Live the green, green grasses and open spaces of home!! |
| |
| Leeorah Hursky | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 20:17:29 UTC Please save the Pavilion as its a great source of pleasure for many people includng myself.Dont let greed over take the needs of the common folk |
| |
| Ruth Hall | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 18:46:15 UTC
|
| |
| David Horler | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 18:03:36 UTC
|
| |
| Kandra Kay | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 17:56:04 UTC
|
| |
| amanda mkhwanazi | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:20:55 UTC
|
| |
| Philip Miller | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 14:25:43 UTC now more developments to prevent public access to all! |
| |
| Sonja Chambers | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 14:06:58 UTC Save the natural beauty of Cape Town - don\'t let greedy developers destroy our beautiful city. |
| |
| Linda Howe-Ely | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 11:49:47 UTC Go for it SEAFA! |
| |
| Annamarie Lazenby | Signed on: Fri 06 Mar 2009 08:53:43 UTC WE NEED TO KEEP OUR BEACH FRONT AS IS. BECAUSE IT IS HOME TO Sa\'S ANIMALS AND WE NEED TO PROTECT THEYRE NATURAL HABITAT AND NOT TRY TO MAKE MORE MONEY AND ATTACT MORE TRAFFIC. WHICH WILL ONLY END UP DESTROYING EVERYTHING THAT MAKE\'S OUR BEACH FRONT BREATH TAKING. |
| |
| FRED STOLPER | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 21:41:34 UTC NO COMMENT |
| |
| Mark Pickering | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 17:47:36 UTC
|
| |
| Michael Fernandes | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 14:43:07 UTC
|
| |
| Maya Goldman | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 14:31:54 UTC This is one of the most important public spaces in Cape Town which is being constantly used. It is not a disused site which would harm no-one by being renovated. We need more spaces like this. It should not be allowed to be broken up. |
| |
| Lionel Wood | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 13:02:59 UTC
|
| |
| Angel Kamp | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 12:52:31 UTC Is it really necessary to take more public open space away from our people for the sake of a few buildings? The Sea Point Beachfront was our playground when we were kids, is still our favourite walking/running/watching people spot 30 years later. And we are not alone.... |
| |
| Ronnie Kann | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 11:26:32 UTC
|
| |
| RUWAYDA OSMAN | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 11:21:46 UTC
|
| |
| bianca Uriot | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 10:06:34 UTC
|
| |
| Richard Ferraris | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 09:55:42 UTC
|
| |
| Keri Ellis | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 09:52:21 UTC
|
| |
| Ayesha Agherdien | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 09:25:51 UTC
|
| |
| kathleen Schwentafsk | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 09:22:48 UTC thank you for what you do ....we need more people like you. |
| |
| Amina | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 09:20:21 UTC
|
| |
| Henriette Ellis | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 09:14:39 UTC
|
| |
| Gavin Sher | Signed on: Thu 05 Mar 2009 09:09:39 UTC We already have more commercial centres/stores than we need in the area. I would much rather have the very rare and special space that is the promenade, as it is, than additional shops that will add nothing to my life whatsoever, except more traffic. |
| |