|
| Morris Stoch | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 23:06:47 UTC
|
| |
| janet steer | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 22:45:36 UTC
|
| |
| Gakiema | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 22:32:26 UTC Keep public open spaces just that ... Public! |
| |
| G Ganie | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 22:31:28 UTC Keep public open spaces for the public. |
| |
| MM le Riche | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 22:28:21 UTC Former resident of Sea Point, still a regular visitor. Developing the seafront will destroy the whole character of Sea Point and lose a vauluable community space. Don't! |
| |
| Henning Schimanke | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 22:03:09 UTC
|
| |
| Helen Paice | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:50:30 UTC It would be a tragedy to lose this beautiful beach front. There are so many people around here living in flats with no gardens and these are the only outdoor areas they and their children have to enjoy. Don't do it! |
| |
| Yvonne Kedzierski | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:50:11 UTC No development on the sea side of Beach Road should ever be allowed. Let the residents and visitors enjoy the promenade. As it is today, so it should stay. |
| |
| Alten Hulme | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:38:42 UTC I want the development to have a much smaller scale |
| |
| Heather Coull | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:36:30 UTC I grew up on the Atlantic Coast and treasure the memories. Our children should be able to have those too - not a concrete jungle. All big cities preserve the area around their water features for the public, Toronto, New York (Battey?Central Park), Sydney - why must we get second best? |
| |
| Darron Guberman | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:35:54 UTC Some of my tax money goes to the upkeep of public spaces. If you allow development, will you return my tax money? If not, leave the public spaces as is! |
| |
| bella llllllllllllll | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:17:44 UTC please do not let this happen |
| |
| Stuart Hill | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:11:11 UTC Stop the rezoning and leave the promenade as it is! |
| |
| Josie Hill | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:09:59 UTC Please DO NOT allow this rezoning! It is a gorgeous public space and we cannot risk ANY precendent. It took us years to recover from the last commercial building that went up on the promenade - please dont do that to us again. |
| |
| Ted Preciado | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 21:04:44 UTC Anything to stop more and more development without thought of the environment and/or the local people who are affected most. |
| |
| Karin Wood | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:59:46 UTC
|
| |
| Peter Koeppen | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:53:46 UTC Keep the Sea Point Pavilion and adjacent promenade public space. The strand development was a failure and a sea point development will be equally cursed. |
| |
| Andre Bottger | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:49:40 UTC Keep the prom as it is! |
| |
| Christina Guberman | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:48:25 UTC The is a reminder to the city counsil and any people in authority acting on behalf of the public, that rezoning public space, especially in Sea Point is absolutly not in the best interest of the Public at large but only in the interest of developers and corporate chains. Please do not allow the planned rezoning to take place at any cost what so ever. |
| |
| kate boswell | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:47:58 UTC
|
| |
| Hein Koen | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:40:04 UTC Save open space! |
| |
| KAtrin Bohlender | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:38:28 UTC No to rezoning! |
| |
| Vanessa Alsop | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:32:02 UTC
|
| |
| inge prins | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 20:23:58 UTC Seapoint prommenade should definately stay a public space - a city gets its flavour by its public spaces and this city belongs to us and not to the investors!!!!!! |
| |
| Sean Payne | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 19:44:43 UTC Leave the promenade as is, we already have the stadium, what will be left if we let go of the pool, the grass on the beach front will be next to some money whore. |
| |
| Sam Brink | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 19:39:53 UTC NO TO REZONING AND NO TO DEVELOPMENT |
| |
| lauren snitcher | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 19:30:06 UTC
|
| |
| Riette Ackermann | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:55:08 UTC
|
| |
| mohamad Gabriels | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:51:42 UTC I fully object to any development taking place at the Sea Point Pavillion.My children have been going there since 2002,and is a well known recreational environment for family gatherings. |
| |
| Andries du Toit | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:50:58 UTC The Seapoint seafront is a public resource that should be open to all Cape Town's people. At the moment it is a democratic, open space where people of all walks can come together. The open vista to the sea, which will be obscured by the proposed development, is a major asset. We don't need another mall! |
| |
| Megan Dummett | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:35:13 UTC
|
| |
| Samantha Meiring | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:34:52 UTC As a born and bred Capetonian, I'm horrified by the proposal. Everytime I look the reasons to come back to South Africa are being destroyed. |
| |
| Craig Dummett | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:34:31 UTC
|
| |
| Helen J v R | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:30:08 UTC This is absolutely ridiculous. I cannot believe that anyone would want to do this. It seems that nothing is sacred at all anymore. |
| |
| Alister Smuts | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:20:16 UTC
|
| |
| Stephen Moore | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:12:59 UTC I think it should be left as is |
| |
| Jeff Bub | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:12:36 UTC
|
| |
| Felix Dubs | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 18:11:23 UTC This is unbelievable!!! Some developers need a bulldozer run up their trouser-leg!!! |
| |
| Catherine Flanigan | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:59:34 UTC
|
| |
| Riki Geard | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:57:24 UTC The Seapoint promenade is a sacred place for locals and tourists to enjoy the beauty of our beachfront by walking their dogs, jogging, power walking, pushing their baby buggies or just sitting quietly on the benches. Taking that away from us would be an absolute shame! |
| |
| Paul Louw | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:55:33 UTC
|
| |
| Sue Dalton | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:47:43 UTC
|
| |
| Anne | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:47:01 UTC You know why Muizenberg and the cape is the most favourable area to live? cause it it authentic and grown naturally. Some developments are just enough. keep the city natural please! |
| |
| sonwabo | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:46:32 UTC we have enough malls already. go build somewhere else |
| |
| rhona & syd wolpert | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:45:47 UTC keep the beachfront open |
| |
| Duncan | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:43:36 UTC The best place to walk in the evening |
| |
| valerie mazinter | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:24:48 UTC there should be no development allowed of the areas around the Sea Point Pavillion. Not now and not at any future time. |
| |
| André Venter | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:23:35 UTC
|
| |
| marrin hansen | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:18:56 UTC It would be a total disaster if you would build a shopping mall etc. on the beach promenade. Daily we go there for a walk and enjoy the open space very much. we disapprove the rezoning stongly. |
| |
| A Cibrario | Signed on: Mon 21 Jan 2008 17:08:16 UTC Our public area should not be taken away from us for the sole purpose of enriching someone from the private sector. Other areas are in more need of development and nature should be cherished. Would you build a hotel in a rainforest, just because it is beautiful there? The mere fact that it is unspoilt, makes it beautiful - as it is also in this case. Leave the promanade alone for residents and holiday makers alike, to continue enjoying as they have been... |
| |